The 2012 Hall of Fame ballot was one of the weaker ones in terms of players who were making their first appearance on it. This was reflected in voting results as well, with Bernie Williams being the only guy in his first year of eligibility gaining more than 5.0% to remain on the ballot for next year. Despite only receiving 9.6% of votes, Bernie Williams still serves as one of the more compelling arguments towards Hall of Fame election if you look at his stats in the context of which he put them up. By looking closer at Williams’ career, a more interesting way to evaluate a player’s stats towards Hall of Fame election comes to the forefront, and it is a much more relevant way to judge a player rather than simple career totals.
Playing his whole career for the Yankees from 1991 to 2006, it is fair to say that Bernie Williams was one of the top 3 CF of that time period, with Ken Griffey Jr. and Jim Edmonds being the other two. One can wrongly look at career totals, and quickly judge Griffey and Edmonds to be better CFs, but if you correctly look on a year by year basis, you can make a case that Williams may have been the best of the 3 offensively for a period of time. Take the 10 year time frame of 1994 through 2003 for example:
Ken Griffey Jr: 847 R (5 100+), 349 HR (6 40+), 931 RBI (5 100+)
Jim Edmonds: 868 R (3 100+), 260 HR (4 30+), 794 RBI (3 100+)
Bernie Williams: 994 R (7 100+), 221 HR (1 of 30), 934 RBI (5 100+)
Looking further into more meaningful numbers over that period:
Griffey: .288 AVG / .381 OBP / .588 SLG
Edmonds: .294 AVG / .381 OBP / .535 SLG
Williams: .314 AVG / .401 OBP / .515 SLG
In fact, from 1994 to 2003, Bernie Williams became the first CF to have a BA over .300, an OBP over .400, and a SLG over .500 for a 10 year period since Mickey Mantle. It is also important to note that Williams led all American League CF in OBP 7 times over that period, with Mantle (10), Ty Cobb (8), and Tris Speaker (8) being the only CFs in American League history to accomplish that more times in a career (The NL record for CF is Willie Mays with 7). Edmonds led the NL CFs in OBP 4 times in his career, and Griffey did the same for CFs in the AL 3 times.
The most important thing to consider within this context is how often each of the 3 players played at an All-Star level in terms of WAR and oWAR over this designated period. Using this as an evaluation, all 3 players indeed had a great 10 year stretch, with Griffey having a 5.0+ WAR and 5.0+ oWAR 5 times, Edmonds 5 times for WAR and 4 times for oWAR, and Williams 5 and 6 times respectively. In the end, Griffey and Edmonds were better all-around CFs for the entirety of their careers, with Griffey already having 3 5.0+ WAR seasons prior to this stretch, and Edmonds having 2 more 5.0+ WAR seasons after 2003. The 5 seasons Williams enjoyed of a 5.0+ WAR during this stretch were the only ones in his career, but still serve to show that he was an impressive player when compared to other greats at his position in his era.
Williams will be hurt by his defense in the end. His dWAR over the period of 1994-2003 was -8.3, while Griffey and Edmonds had dWARs of 4.3 and 6.3 respectively, as both were good defensive CFs over that period. With this, it will be interesting to see how much poor defense can hurt a player’s chances at Hall of Fame election, while so far, we have only seen great defense benefit some guys chances (Ozzie Smith (true) and supposedly Bill Mazeroski).
Another interesting variable that Bernie Williams brings to the table is how much playoff production can benefit a player’s hall of fame chances. During the 10 years of his career that were mentioned earlier, the Yankees were in the playoffs for 9 of them, winning 4 World Series. Williams also arguably slightly outperformed Derek Jeter over that period, going .278 / .386 / .483 to Jeter’s .314 / .385 / .465. Playoff performance should be very highly thought of, but it’s hard to determine in what way and to what extent. It is not out of the question though that Williams is one of the best CFs in the postseason in recent memory.
In the end, it will be interesting to see how Bernie Williams is viewed in future Hall of Fame elections. He is one of the more compelling candidates to ever appear on the ballot, and if anything, is much more of a possible Hall of Fame candidate than the initial 9.6% suggests.